Demographic information
6. Which of the following most closely describes your place of residence?
Please select from the drop down list
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
East of England
Radio button:
Unticked
East Midlands
Radio button:
Ticked
London & South East
Radio button:
Unticked
North East
Radio button:
Unticked
North West
Radio button:
Unticked
South West
Radio button:
Unticked
West Midlands
Radio button:
Unticked
Yorkshire & Humber
Radio button:
Unticked
Northern Ireland
Radio button:
Unticked
Scotland
Radio button:
Unticked
Wales
Radio button:
Unticked
Republic of Ireland
Radio button:
Unticked
Prefer not to say
Radio button:
Unticked
Other
9. Which of the following best describes you?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Academic (registered architect)
Radio button:
Unticked
Academic (other)
Radio button:
Unticked
Registered Architect
Radio button:
Ticked
Architectural assistant, designer or consultant (not Part 3 qualified)
Radio button:
Unticked
Architecture Student – undergraduate (studying Part 1)
Radio button:
Unticked
Architecture Student – graduate (studying Part 2)
Radio button:
Unticked
Architecture Student – Part 3 candidate
Radio button:
Unticked
Elected political representative e.g. councillor or MP
Radio button:
Unticked
Member of the public
Radio button:
Unticked
Other built environment professional
Radio button:
Unticked
Other
Survey
11. Chapter 5 of the discussion paper sets out the vision for our new regulatory approach. To what extent do you agree with our vision? Please feel free to explain your view, and make any suggestions as to what is missing.
| 1. Public Strongly agree Radio button: Checked Strongly agree | 1. Public Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | 1. Public Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 1. Public Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 1. Public Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
| 2. Profession and employers Strongly agree Radio button: Checked Strongly agree | 2. Profession and employers Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | 2. Profession and employers Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 2. Profession and employers Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 2. Profession and employers Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
| 3. Institutions Strongly agree Radio button: Checked Strongly agree | 3. Institutions Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | 3. Institutions Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 3. Institutions Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 3. Institutions Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
| 4. Future architects Strongly agree Radio button: Checked Strongly agree | 4. Future architects Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | 4. Future architects Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 4. Future architects Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 4. Future architects Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
| 5. Regulatory Strongly agree Radio button: Checked Strongly agree | 5. Regulatory Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | 5. Regulatory Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 5. Regulatory Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 5. Regulatory Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
Please write your explanations and/ or suggestions in the box
Architecture is largely skills and experience based so it is crucial that academia reflects this. If it were to take a similar approach to other industries for example, where a bachelor's is sufficient as an entry point to the industry and moving forward, students work and study alongside. I feel this really strengthens the application of skills and knowledge. The apprenticeship scheme is a good start but it is currently so exclusive
12. To enable institutions to innovate and to promote diversity, we think that the structure needs to change from the current approach of Parts 1, 2 and 3. What are your views on this?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Neither agree nor disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Write any comments in the box
I think the apprenticeship style is better than the current norms to registration. However, it is incredibly exclusive and only for UK citizens which is very limiting. In fact, I personally was not allowed to apply because, although I'm a UK citizen and undertook my bachelor's here, I worked for more than 6 months in another country which apparently means I cannot be a part of the apprenticeship scheme, unless I wait 3 years! This essentially means some people only have one route and it is too rigid. I have now in fact moved on to another related field which is not architecture because of this.
13. We believe that the best way to describe the competencies architects need may be to describe what an architect must KNOW, what they must be able to DO, and how they must BEHAVE. To what extent do you agree?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Neither agree nor disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree