Response 729461504

Back to Response listing

Demographic information

6. Which of the following most closely describes your place of residence?

Please select from the drop down list
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked East of England
Radio button: Unticked East Midlands
Radio button: Ticked London & South East
Radio button: Unticked North East
Radio button: Unticked North West
Radio button: Unticked South West
Radio button: Unticked West Midlands
Radio button: Unticked Yorkshire & Humber
Radio button: Unticked Northern Ireland
Radio button: Unticked Scotland
Radio button: Unticked Wales
Radio button: Unticked Republic of Ireland
Radio button: Unticked Prefer not to say
Radio button: Unticked Other

9. Which of the following best describes you?

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Academic (registered architect)
Radio button: Unticked Academic (other)
Radio button: Unticked Registered Architect
Radio button: Unticked Architectural assistant, designer or consultant (not Part 3 qualified)
Radio button: Unticked Architecture Student – undergraduate (studying Part 1)
Radio button: Unticked Architecture Student – graduate (studying Part 2)
Radio button: Unticked Architecture Student – Part 3 candidate
Radio button: Unticked Elected political representative e.g. councillor or MP
Radio button: Unticked Member of the public
Radio button: Unticked Other built environment professional
Radio button: Ticked Other

Survey

10. Chapter 4 of the discussion paper sets out the evidence we have analysed to date, and the conclusions we’ve reached. Is there anything you believe is missing from these conclusions, that we should also take into account as we start developing the outcomes-based approach?

Write your answer in the box
Appropriate pay for apprentices and students - no one should be working for a chartered practise and be paid minimum wage. Unfortunately RIBA don’t enforce the living wage as they like to advertise.

Apprenticeships should be pushed more. Practical experience is vital, and Part 1’s and 2’s do not get enough, especially if the practise is poor at supporting students.

11. Chapter 5 of the discussion paper sets out the vision for our new regulatory approach. To what extent do you agree with our vision? Please feel free to explain your view, and make any suggestions as to what is missing.

1. Public Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree 1. Public Agree Radio button: Checked Agree 1. Public Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree 1. Public Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree 1. Public Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree
2. Profession and employers Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree 2. Profession and employers Agree Radio button: Checked Agree 2. Profession and employers Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree 2. Profession and employers Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree 2. Profession and employers Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree
3. Institutions Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree 3. Institutions Agree Radio button: Checked Agree 3. Institutions Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree 3. Institutions Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree 3. Institutions Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree
4. Future architects Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree 4. Future architects Agree Radio button: Checked Agree 4. Future architects Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree 4. Future architects Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree 4. Future architects Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree
5. Regulatory Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree 5. Regulatory Agree Radio button: Checked Agree 5. Regulatory Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree 5. Regulatory Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree 5. Regulatory Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree
Please write your explanations and/ or suggestions in the box
This is very vague.

Again, more emphasis on HOW the education will be improved and working conditions/pay is needed.

12. To enable institutions to innovate and to promote diversity, we think that the structure needs to change from the current approach of Parts 1, 2 and 3. What are your views on this?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Strongly agree
Radio button: Unticked Agree
Radio button: Unticked Neither agree nor disagree
Radio button: Unticked Disagree
Radio button: Unticked Strongly disagree
Write any comments in the box
Absolutely! Apprenticeships solve this.

13. We believe that the best way to describe the competencies architects need may be to describe what an architect must KNOW, what they must be able to DO, and how they must BEHAVE. To what extent do you agree?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Strongly agree
Radio button: Unticked Agree
Radio button: Unticked Neither agree nor disagree
Radio button: Unticked Disagree
Radio button: Unticked Strongly disagree

14. Are there any other views you would like to share with us about this work?

Write any comments in the box
Please focus on working conditions, pay and encouraging apprenticeships!