Introduction
1. What is your name?
Name
Grahame White
3. Are you responding in an official capacity on behalf of an organisation?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Yes
Radio button:
Ticked
No
If yes, please name the organisation here
OWLarchitecture.com
Demographic information
6. Which of the following most closely describes your place of residence?
Please select from the drop down list
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
East of England
Radio button:
Unticked
East Midlands
Radio button:
Unticked
London & South East
Radio button:
Unticked
North East
Radio button:
Unticked
North West
Radio button:
Unticked
South West
Radio button:
Unticked
West Midlands
Radio button:
Ticked
Yorkshire & Humber
Radio button:
Unticked
Northern Ireland
Radio button:
Unticked
Scotland
Radio button:
Unticked
Wales
Radio button:
Unticked
Republic of Ireland
Radio button:
Unticked
Prefer not to say
Radio button:
Unticked
Other
9. Which of the following best describes you?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
Academic (registered architect)
Radio button:
Unticked
Academic (other)
Radio button:
Ticked
Registered Architect
Radio button:
Unticked
Architectural assistant, designer or consultant (not Part 3 qualified)
Radio button:
Unticked
Architecture Student – undergraduate (studying Part 1)
Radio button:
Unticked
Architecture Student – graduate (studying Part 2)
Radio button:
Unticked
Architecture Student – Part 3 candidate
Radio button:
Unticked
Elected political representative e.g. councillor or MP
Radio button:
Unticked
Member of the public
Radio button:
Unticked
Other built environment professional
Radio button:
Unticked
Other
For registered architects
When did you qualify?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Unticked
0-5 years ago
Radio button:
Unticked
6-10 years ago
Radio button:
Unticked
11-20 years ago
Radio button:
Ticked
21+ years ago
What is the size of your architectural practice?
Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button:
Ticked
Small or self-employed (1-10 employees)
Radio button:
Unticked
Medium (11-50 employees)
Radio button:
Unticked
Large (51+ employees)
Radio button:
Unticked
I'm not practicing at the moment
Radio button:
Unticked
I work at another type of organisation (e.g. developer, local authority)
In which of the following types of architecture have you the most experience? Select all that apply
Please select all that apply
(Required)
Checkbox:
Unticked
Commercial (including office and retail)
Checkbox:
Unticked
Community or non-residential institution
Checkbox:
Unticked
Defence and security
Checkbox:
Ticked
Education
Checkbox:
Ticked
Healthcare
Checkbox:
Ticked
Heritage and Conservation
Checkbox:
Ticked
Housing: single dwelling (new build or refurbishment)
Checkbox:
Ticked
Housing: multiple dwellings (excluding high rise)
Checkbox:
Unticked
Housing: high rise residential buildings
Checkbox:
Ticked
Housing: institutional (including care homes, hostels, student accommodation)
Checkbox:
Ticked
Hospitality (including hotels and restaurants)
Checkbox:
Unticked
Inclusive design
Checkbox:
Unticked
Masterplanning or large-scale mixed use
Checkbox:
Unticked
Infrastructure
Checkbox:
Unticked
Sustainable design
Checkbox:
Unticked
Transport (including aviation and rail)
Checkbox:
Unticked
Other
Survey
10. Chapter 4 of the discussion paper sets out the evidence we have analysed to date, and the conclusions we’ve reached. Is there anything you believe is missing from these conclusions, that we should also take into account as we start developing the outcomes-based approach?
Write your answer in the box
Well I did not know I needed to read a chapter 4 before doing the quick survey...
I believe that architects operate in different fields need different skillsets thus to have a qualification that is in effectively a driving licence for all vehicles now seems inappropriate.
I graduated from Kingston upon Thames in 1984 with a Diploma and spent the following summer travelling the USA. I was rather taken aback by being repeated asked on that trip what my specialism was. I thought that I was a generalist, but the USA at that time lead the way by having specialists within the overall umbrella of Architecture. I think that we have now arrived at this specialist agenda and perhaps we ned to enable architects to have limited scopes of services with matching professional indemnity insurance. For example some professional insurance schemes prohibit tall building or basement work from their cover. Perhaps the slice and dice of the generalist workload needs to be fashioned in training to match the professional indemnity insurance available to cover it.
Gaping holes in my own university experience and professional competence examination were evident by lack of teaching and knowledge on subjects such as
Law, Town Planning and all the associated fields such as tree preservation orders, contamination, bio-diversity etc...
Of course on a day to day basis we all continue to work and learn.
Future challenges such as insulation our existing dwelling stock without generating significant failure via cold bridge appreciation and the relationship between air-tightness ventilation and interstitial condensation as well as surface condensation. Before long gas prices will match electric prices as part of or de-carbonising agenda and fuel poverty will be rife. Is this something that architects can do anything about.?
I believe that architects operate in different fields need different skillsets thus to have a qualification that is in effectively a driving licence for all vehicles now seems inappropriate.
I graduated from Kingston upon Thames in 1984 with a Diploma and spent the following summer travelling the USA. I was rather taken aback by being repeated asked on that trip what my specialism was. I thought that I was a generalist, but the USA at that time lead the way by having specialists within the overall umbrella of Architecture. I think that we have now arrived at this specialist agenda and perhaps we ned to enable architects to have limited scopes of services with matching professional indemnity insurance. For example some professional insurance schemes prohibit tall building or basement work from their cover. Perhaps the slice and dice of the generalist workload needs to be fashioned in training to match the professional indemnity insurance available to cover it.
Gaping holes in my own university experience and professional competence examination were evident by lack of teaching and knowledge on subjects such as
Law, Town Planning and all the associated fields such as tree preservation orders, contamination, bio-diversity etc...
Of course on a day to day basis we all continue to work and learn.
Future challenges such as insulation our existing dwelling stock without generating significant failure via cold bridge appreciation and the relationship between air-tightness ventilation and interstitial condensation as well as surface condensation. Before long gas prices will match electric prices as part of or de-carbonising agenda and fuel poverty will be rife. Is this something that architects can do anything about.?
11. Chapter 5 of the discussion paper sets out the vision for our new regulatory approach. To what extent do you agree with our vision? Please feel free to explain your view, and make any suggestions as to what is missing.
1. Public Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree | 1. Public Agree Radio button: Checked Agree | 1. Public Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 1. Public Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 1. Public Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
2. Profession and employers Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree | 2. Profession and employers Agree Radio button: Checked Agree | 2. Profession and employers Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 2. Profession and employers Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 2. Profession and employers Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
3. Institutions Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree | 3. Institutions Agree Radio button: Checked Agree | 3. Institutions Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 3. Institutions Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 3. Institutions Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
4. Future architects Strongly agree Radio button: Checked Strongly agree | 4. Future architects Agree Radio button: Not checked Agree | 4. Future architects Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 4. Future architects Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 4. Future architects Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
5. Regulatory Strongly agree Radio button: Not checked Strongly agree | 5. Regulatory Agree Radio button: Checked Agree | 5. Regulatory Neither agree nor disagree Radio button: Not checked Neither agree nor disagree | 5. Regulatory Disagree Radio button: Not checked Disagree | 5. Regulatory Strongly disagree Radio button: Not checked Strongly disagree |
Please write your explanations and/ or suggestions in the box
Currently there are many excellent architectural designers that never qualified as architects - these skillsets should be given appropriate licences to trade within a specialism of architecture. This is likely to swell your registrant numbers and give the discerning public more than the RIBA as a badge to rely upon.
12. To enable institutions to innovate and to promote diversity, we think that the structure needs to change from the current approach of Parts 1, 2 and 3. What are your views on this?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Ticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Neither agree nor disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Write any comments in the box
The old parts are not the only valid way...
13. We believe that the best way to describe the competencies architects need may be to describe what an architect must KNOW, what they must be able to DO, and how they must BEHAVE. To what extent do you agree?
Please select one item
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly agree
Radio button:
Ticked
Agree
Radio button:
Unticked
Neither agree nor disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Disagree
Radio button:
Unticked
Strongly disagree
Write any comments in the box
Architects need to know what they don`t know how to to do; so that they can always seek appropriate assistance or give recommendation of assistance to their clients.
All participants in the design venture including Architects, Clients, Other Consultants and Constructors need to know how to behave. In my experience it is difficult predict where these failing are likely to occur and why.
Recently it is my experience that young clients do not copy in their architect as they progress their project out-of-sequence and in consequence get into a tangle by not seeking advice.
All participants in the design venture including Architects, Clients, Other Consultants and Constructors need to know how to behave. In my experience it is difficult predict where these failing are likely to occur and why.
Recently it is my experience that young clients do not copy in their architect as they progress their project out-of-sequence and in consequence get into a tangle by not seeking advice.
14. Are there any other views you would like to share with us about this work?
Write any comments in the box
Best and Worst Practice tips and case studies - to be read by Clients and Architects etc... would be of value.
For instance I recall reading part of a dentist training manual (45 yrs ago) that advised it was not a good idea to look inside someone mouth and exclaim "Oh My God!", but this di actually happen to me only last year...
For instance I recall reading part of a dentist training manual (45 yrs ago) that advised it was not a good idea to look inside someone mouth and exclaim "Oh My God!", but this di actually happen to me only last year...